KE v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 684

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 634) ON ALL REMAINING CLAIMS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 632) ON ALL REMAINING CLAIMS IS DENIED. ANY OUTSTANDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/4/15. 9/4/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LEI KE, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6708 v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of September 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 632), Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 634), Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Cross-Motion (Doc. No. 640), Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. No. 647), Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendants’ Response (Doc. No. 652), Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. No. 653), all related exhibits and filings, and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 634) on all remaining claims is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 632) on all remaining claims is DENIED; 3. Any outstanding motions are DENIED AS MOOT; 4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: / s / J oel H. S l om s k y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?