KE v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY et al
Filing
684
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 634) ON ALL REMAINING CLAIMS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 632) ON ALL REMAINING CLAIMS IS DENIED. ANY OUTSTANDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 9/4/15. 9/4/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LEI KE,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-6708
v.
DREXEL UNIVERSITY, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of September 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 632), Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
(Doc. No. 634), Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Cross-Motion (Doc. No. 640), Defendants’
Response to Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. No. 647), Plaintiff’s Reply to Defendants’ Response (Doc.
No. 652), Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. No. 653), all related exhibits and
filings, and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as
follows:
1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 634) on all remaining claims is
GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 632) on all remaining claims is
DENIED;
3. Any outstanding motions are DENIED AS MOOT;
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/ s / J oel H. S l om s k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?