CALLAHAN v. BOROUGH OF BRISTOL et al

Filing 16

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS ELIFA SOTO, WILLIAM DAVIS AND BOROUGH OF BRISTOL'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF RAYMOND CALLAHAN'S &1983 CLAIMS FOR FALSE ARREST AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 7/31/12. 7/31/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RAYMOND CALLAHAN
v.
BOROUGH OF BRISTOL, et al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 11-6977

ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of July, 2012, it is ORDERED Defendants Elifa Soto, William
Davis, and the Borough of Bristol’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Document
11) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Raymond Callahan’s § 1983 claims for false arrest and false
imprisonment are DISMISSED with prejudice as barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
Callahan’s remaining state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1367(c)(3).
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.