LEARY v. ASTRUE

Filing 14

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW BE DENIED; AND JUDGMENT BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 6/6/13. 6/10/13 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLARK LEARY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6980 ORDER AND NOW, this ____ day of June, 2013, after careful and independent review of the Report and Recommendation of Thomas J. Rueter, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation be APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The Plaintiff’s Request for Review be DENIED; and 3. Judgment be ENTERED in favor of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration.1 1 This Court is bound by the Commissioner’s findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence in the record. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). “Substantial evidence” is defined as “more than a mere scintilla,” but less than a preponderance, of such “relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate.” Plummer v. Apfel, 186 F.3d 422, 427 (3d Cir. 1999). In this case, there is “substantial evidence” to support the Commissioner’s final decision that Plaintiff failed to meet a listed impairment to be found disabled and that, although Plaintiff could not perform his past relevant work, he could perform other work in the national economy. Further, Plaintiff has not filed any objections identifying factual errors in the magistrate’s report or pointing to other evidence which would render the magistrate’s conclusions, affirming the Commissioner’s decision, unsupported by the record. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated in the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation, this Court enters judgment in favor of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. 1 BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker ________________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?