KEAHEY v. BETHEL TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA et al

Filing 33

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ON THE ENTIRETY OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST IT. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OF WENDY KEAHEY IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE TO BAR INTRODUCTION OF HIS PROFESSION IN EVIDENCE AND TO BAR MARK ALLEN RAITH FROM PRESENTING OPENING AND CLOSING STATEMENTS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THIS CASE IS NOW CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 12/13/12. 12/14/12 ENTERED & E-MAILED.[fdc]

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GEORGE B. KEAHEY, Plaintiff, v. BETHEL TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7210 ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants Bethel Township, Lieutenant William Coyle, Corporal Chris Kimball, Officer Brian Buck, Officer James Register, Detective Russell Mervine, Officer Sean Bradshaw, and Officer Lou Stackeni’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 22), the Response of Plaintiff George Keahey (Docket No. 27), Defendants’ Reply Brief (Docket No. 29), and Plaintiff’s Sur-Reply Brief (Docket No. 31), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Defendants on the entirety of the Amended Complaint against it. 3. Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File an Affidavit of Wendy Keahey is DENIED as moot. 4. Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine to Bar Introduction of his Profession in Evidence and to Bar Mark Allen Raith from Presenting Opening and Closing Statements are DENIED as moot. This case is now CLOSED. BY THE COURT: s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?