KEATON v. FOLINO et al
Filing
133
ORDER THAT KEATON'S AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 20) IS DENIED. THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT & RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 121) IS APPROVED & ADOPTED; KEATON'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. NO. 128) ARE OVERRULED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE; & THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 6/19/19. 6/19/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ALEXANDER KEATON,
Petitioner,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
v.
LOUIS FOLINO, et al.,
Respondents.
Civ. No. 11-7225
JUDGMENT
AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of Petitioner Alexander
Keaton’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 20), Magistrate Judge Lloret’s
Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 121), Keaton’s Objections (Doc. No. 128), and all related
filings, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Keaton’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED;
2. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 121) is APPROVED
and ADOPTED;
3. Keaton’s Objections (Doc. No. 128) are OVERRULED;
4. A certificate of appealability will NOT ISSUE; and
5. The CLERK OF COURT shall CLOSE this case.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Paul S. Diamond
_______________________
Paul S. Diamond, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?