KEATON v. FOLINO et al

Filing 133

ORDER THAT KEATON'S AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 20) IS DENIED. THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT & RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 121) IS APPROVED & ADOPTED; KEATON'S OBJECTIONS (DOC. NO. 128) ARE OVERRULED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL NOT ISSUE; & THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 6/19/19. 6/19/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALEXANDER KEATON, Petitioner, : : : : : : : v. LOUIS FOLINO, et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 11-7225 JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of Petitioner Alexander Keaton’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 20), Magistrate Judge Lloret’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 121), Keaton’s Objections (Doc. No. 128), and all related filings, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Keaton’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED; 2. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 121) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. Keaton’s Objections (Doc. No. 128) are OVERRULED; 4. A certificate of appealability will NOT ISSUE; and 5. The CLERK OF COURT shall CLOSE this case. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Paul S. Diamond _______________________ Paul S. Diamond, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?