FOSTER v. PITNEY BOWES CORPORATION et al

Filing 62

ADDENDUM TO ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 12, 2013: ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PITNEY BOWES AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON COUNT I OF PITNEY BOWES' COUNTERCLAIM (NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,707,119). COUNT II OF PITNEY BOWES' COU NTERCLAIM (INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,707,119) IS DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(2). THIS CASE SHALL REMAIN CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/12/2013. 4/12/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FREDERICK FOSTER, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7303 v. PITNEY BOWES CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. ADDENDUM TO ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 12, 2013 AND NOW, this 12th day of April 2013, upon consideration of Defendant Pitney Bowes, Inc.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 35), and in light of the Court’s Opinion dated February 7, 2013 (Doc. No. 50), Pitney Bowes’ letter dated March 4, 2013 (Doc. No. 56), and the Court’s Order issued this day denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 53), it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Pitney Bowes and against Plaintiff on Count I of Pitney Bowes’ Counterclaim (Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,707,119). 2. Count II of Pitney Bowes’ Counterclaim (Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 7,707,119) is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). 3. This case shall remain closed for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: / s/ J oel H. S l om sk y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?