SULLIVAN v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY

Filing 20

ORDER THAT TEMPLE UNIVERSITY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART AS FOLLLOWS: TEMPLE UNIVERSITY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED BY AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES TO THE EXTENT SULLIVAN'S CLAIMS ARE BASED ON RETALIATION; & TEMPLE UNIVERSITY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT SULLIVAN'S CLAIMS ARE BASED ON AGE DISCRIMINATION, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 3/5/13. 3/6/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
_____________________________________
DANIEL SULLIVAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY,
Defendant.
_____________________________________

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 11-7305

ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of March, 2013, upon consideration of Temple University’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Document No. 11, filed August 13, 2012), Temple University’s Statement of
Material Facts (Document No. 12, filed August 13, 2012), Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Document No. 13, filed September 5, 2012), and Temple’s Reply Brief in
Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 16, filed September 12, 2012), for the
reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated March 5, 2013, IT IS ORDERED that Temple University’s
Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
1.

Temple University’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED by agreement of the

parties to the extent Sullivan’s claims are based on retaliation; and
2.

Temple University’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED to the extent Sullivan’s

claims are based on age discrimination.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a scheduling conference will be convened in due course.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
______________________
JAN E. DuBOIS, J.