MCDERMOTT v. PICKINS et al
Filing
35
ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS (DOC. NOS. 25, 26 AND 29) ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 4/23/13. 4/24/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH MCDERMOTT,
Petitioner,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT PICKINS,
et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-7343
ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2013, upon consideration of the Petitioner’s
Motions for Reconsideration (Doc. Nos. 25 and 26) and For The Acceptance By This
Court Of Case Law Verifications (Doc. No. 29), and the Response thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motions are DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/LAWRENCE F. STENGEL
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?