MCDERMOTT v. PICKINS et al

Filing 35

ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS (DOC. NOS. 25, 26 AND 29) ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 4/23/13. 4/24/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH MCDERMOTT, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT PICKINS, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7343 ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2013, upon consideration of the Petitioner’s Motions for Reconsideration (Doc. Nos. 25 and 26) and For The Acceptance By This Court Of Case Law Verifications (Doc. No. 29), and the Response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/LAWRENCE F. STENGEL LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?