ROBERTSHAW v. PUDLES et al

Filing 218

ORDER THAT CERIDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION'S MOTION TO INTERVENE IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 5/6/2014. 5/6/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BARBARA ROBERTSHAW v. GARY PUDLES, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7353 ORDER AND NOW this 6th day of May, 2014 upon consideration of Cerida Investment Corporation’s motion to intervene, Dkt. No. 180, plaintiff Barbara Robertshaw’s response thereto, Dkt. No. 190, Cerida’s reply, Dkt. No. 191, Cerida’s supplemental brief, Dkt. No. 208, and Robertshaw’s reply to Cerida’s supplemental brief, Dkt. No. 211, and consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ORDERED that Cerida’s motion to intervene is DENIED. s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr. THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?