ROBERTSHAW v. PUDLES et al

Filing 236

ORDER THAT THE EMERGENCY MOTIONS FOR A STAY PENDING APPEAL ARE HEREBY GRANTED, AND PLAINTIFF SHALL TAKE NO FURTHER ACTIONS THAT ARE PERMITTED BY THE COURT'S ORDERS DATED 8/5/2013, AND 5/6/2014, PENDING DISPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS' AND CERIDA'S APPEALS TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 5/15/2014. 5/15/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BARBARA ROBERTSHAW
v.
GARY PUDLES, et al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-7353

ORDER
AND NOW, this 15 day of May, 2014, upon consideration of an emergency motion for a
stay pending appeal by defendants Answernet, Inc. and Gary Pudles (Dkt. No. 221), non-party
Cerida Investment Corporation’s emergency motion for a stay pending appeal (Dkt. No. 224),
and plaintiff’s responses thereto (Dkt. Nos. 227 and 228), and after oral argument it is
ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED and plaintiff shall take no further actions that are
permitted by the Court’s Orders dated August 5, 2014 (Dkt. No. 176) and May 6, 2014 (Dkt No.
216) pending disposition of defendants’ and Cerida’s appeals to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit.
s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.