KHAN v. GORDON et al

Filing 51

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETIITONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; AND A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 9/9/13. 9/13/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, ) Modified on 9/13/2013 (lvj, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SHAFAAT KHAN, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL GORDON, et al., Respondents. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7465 ORDER AND NOW, this ____ day of September, 2013, upon consideration of Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (Doc. 47), and Petitioner’s Objections filed thereto (Doc. 48), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and 3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case as CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker ____________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?