KHAN v. GORDON et al
Filing
51
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETIITONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; AND A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 9/9/13. 9/13/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, ) Modified on 9/13/2013 (lvj, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SHAFAAT KHAN,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL GORDON, et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-7465
ORDER
AND NOW, this ____ day of September, 2013, upon consideration of Petitioner’s Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (Doc. 47), and Petitioner’s Objections filed thereto (Doc. 48),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED as follows:
1.
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2.
Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED without an
evidentiary hearing; and
3.
A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case as CLOSED for
statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
____________________________
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?