MAXWELL v. NUTTER et al
ORDER THAT THE PORTION OF THE MOTION SEEKING THE DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND ITS POLICE COMMISISONER IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES IS GRANTED. THE CITY OF PHILA IS ADDED AS A DEFT TO REPLACE THE MAYOR AND THE POLICE COMMISSIONER AS DEFTS BEING SUED IN THIEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES. THE PORTION OF THE MOTION SEEKING THE DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE MAYOR AND THE POLCIE COMMISSIONER IN THEIR PERSONAL CAPACITIES IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 1/23/13. 1/24/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TYREEK M. MAXWELL,
MICHAEL NUTTER, MAYOR OF
PHILADELPHIA, et al.,
AND NOW, this
day of January, 2013, upon consideration of the
defendants’ partial motion to dismiss (Document #8), it is hereby ORDERED that the
motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:
The portion of the motion seeking the dismissal of all
claims against the Mayor of the City of Philadelphia
and its Police Commissioner in their official
capacities is GRANTED.
Pursuant to Rule 19(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, the City of Philadelphia is ADDED
as a defendant to replace the Mayor and the Police
Commissioner as defendants being sued in their
The portion of the motion seeking the dismissal
of all claims against the Mayor and the Police
Commissioner in their personal capacities is
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?