MAXWELL v. NUTTER et al

Filing 11

ORDER THAT THE PORTION OF THE MOTION SEEKING THE DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND ITS POLICE COMMISISONER IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES IS GRANTED. THE CITY OF PHILA IS ADDED AS A DEFT TO REPLACE THE MAYOR AND THE POLICE COMMISSIONER AS DEFTS BEING SUED IN THIEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES. THE PORTION OF THE MOTION SEEKING THE DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE MAYOR AND THE POLCIE COMMISSIONER IN THEIR PERSONAL CAPACITIES IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 1/23/13. 1/24/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TYREEK M. MAXWELL, Plaintiff : : : : : : : : vs. MICHAEL NUTTER, MAYOR OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-7565 ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2013, upon consideration of the defendants’ partial motion to dismiss (Document #8), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1. The portion of the motion seeking the dismissal of all claims against the Mayor of the City of Philadelphia and its Police Commissioner in their official capacities is GRANTED. 2. Pursuant to Rule 19(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the City of Philadelphia is ADDED as a defendant to replace the Mayor and the Police Commissioner as defendants being sued in their official capacities. 3. The portion of the motion seeking the dismissal of all claims against the Mayor and the Police Commissioner in their personal capacities is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?