ANDREWS v. ROZUM et al

Filing 29

ORDER AS FOLLOWS: PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE IS DENIED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/30/13. 7/30/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL ANDREWS,
Plaintiff,
v.
GERALD ROZUM, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-7731

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2013, for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
(1)

Petitioner’s Motion for Stay and Abeyance (ECF No. 27) is
DENIED;

(2)

The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20) is APPROVED
and ADOPTED;

(3)

Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation
(ECF Nos. 23, 26)1 are OVERRULED;

(4)

1

The Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1)

The Court construes Petitioner’s two filings titled,
“Supplement to Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment” as his
Objections to the Report and Recommendation.

is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
(5)

A certificate of appealability shall not issue; and

(6)

The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.

2