BOLLENDORF v. ASTRUE
ORDER THAT THERE BEING NO OBJECTIONS FROM DEFT, THE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED & ADOPTED. PLFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED & THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. SEC. 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSI STENT WITH THE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLFF, REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS REMAND ONLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 9/13/12. 9/17/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STEPHEN D. BOLLENDORF,
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
AND NOW, this
day of September, 2012, upon independent
consideration of the plaintiff’s request for review, and the defendant’s response thereto,
and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report & Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, IT IS ORDERED that:
There being no Objections from the defendant, the Report &
Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
The plaintiff’s request for review is GRANTED, and the decision of the
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED to the extent that the
matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
for further proceedings consistent with the Report & Recommendation.
Judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff, reversing the decision of the
Commissioner for the purpose of this remand only.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?