DHILLON VS ENDO PHARMACETICALS
Filing
48
ORDER THAT RELATOR GURSHEEL S. DHILLON PRO SE MOTION TO SET ASIDE THE COURTS DECISION AND MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL ORAL ARGUEMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 8/25/14. 8/26/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
ex rel. PEGGY RYAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Defendant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
ex rel. MAX H. WEATHERSBY,
Plaintiff,
v.
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Defendant.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,
ex rel. GURSHEEL S. DHILLON,
Plaintiff,
v.
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 05-3450
No. 10-2039
No. 11-7767
ORDER
AND NOW, this
25th
day of August, 2014, upon consideration of Relator
Gursheel S. Dhillon’s (“Dhillon”), pro se “Motion to Set Aside the Courts [sic] Decision and
Motion for a New Trial Oral Arguement [sic] Requested” (Doc. No. 31), the separate Responses
in Opposition filed by Relator Peggy Ryan and Relator Max Weathersby, and the Reply of
Dhillon thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that Dhillon’s Motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
SENIOR JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?