WEBB v. BRISTOL BOROUGH et al

Filing 61

ORDER to EXPLANATION AND ORDER (ECF NO. 60) that DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 31; DOC. NO. 32) ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART:... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that DEFENDANT GERBER'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 54) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 7/24/2012. 7/24/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S.MAIL.(mo, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RITCHIE WEBB,
Plaintiff,
v.
BRISTOL BOROUGH, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-7834

ORDER
AND NOW, this __24th __ day of July 2012, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions
to Dismiss (Doc. No. 31; Doc. No. 32) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:
• Defendant Lebo’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 31) as to Counts IV-VI (state law
claims) is GRANTED.
• Defendant Siana’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 32) as to Counts I and II (Section 1983
claims) is GRANTED.
• The remaining claims in Defendants’ motions to dismiss (Doc. No 31; Doc. No. 32) are
DENIED without prejudice to raise the claims again at a later stage of the litigation
process.
It is further ORDERED that Defendant Gerber’s supplemental motion to dismiss (Doc.
No. 54) is DENIED without prejudice.
s/Anita B. Brody
__________________________
ANITA B. BRODY, J.

Copies VIA ECF on _________ to:

Copies MAILED on _______ to: