WHITE et al v. THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. et al
Filing
285
ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE PNC'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/24/17. 8/24/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NELSON WHITE, JR., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES
GROUP, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-7928
ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs’
Motion to Strike PNC’s Affirmative Defenses (Doc. No. 271), PNC’s Response in
Opposition (Doc. No. 277), Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum (Doc. No. 279), and PNC’s
Sur-Reply Memorandum (Doc. No. 283), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike PNC’s Affirmative Defenses (Doc. No. 271) is GRANTED
in part and DENIED in part as outlined herein:
1.
The Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike PNC’s first affirmative defense is
DENIED.
2.
The Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike PNC’s third affirmative defense is
DENIED.
3.
The Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike PNC’s seventh affirmative defense is
GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs’ RESPA claims.
4.
PNC’s seventh affirmative defense is STRICKEN with prejudice with
respect to Plaintiffs’ RESPA claims.
5.
The Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike PNC’s seventh affirmative defense is
DENIED with respect to Plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claims.
6.
The Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike PNC’s eighth affirmative defense is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as explained in Section IV(C) of this Court’s
accompanying memorandum.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, C. J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?