SOSA et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY et al
Filing
104
ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION LISTED IN EXHIBIT 'A' ARE GRANTED AND THE DEFENDANTS WHO FILED THE MOTIONS ARE DISMISSED FROM THE CASES. THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS DUE TO IMPROPER SERVICE OF PROCESS LISTED IN EXHIBIT 'B' ARE DENIED. (SEE PAPER NO. 4196 ON 02-MD-875 FOR COMPLETE DOCUMENT PDF) SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 3/11/2014. 3/12/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (aeg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS
:
LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. VI) :
:
JACOBS, ET AL.
:
:
v.
:
:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY
:
TRUST, ET AL.
:
CONSOLIDATED UNDER
MDL DOCKET NO. 875
Certain cases on the
02-md-875 Maritime Docket
(MARDOC), listed in the
attached exhibits
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 11th day of March, 2014, for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
(1)
The motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction
listed in Exhibit “A,” attached, are GRANTED, and the
defendants who filed the motions are DISMISSED from the
cases; and
(2)
The motions to dismiss due to improper service of process
listed in Exhibit “B,” attached, are DENIED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?