THURMON et al v. GEORGIA PACIFIC, LLC et al

Filing 396

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT CERTAIN MOTIONS ARE RULED ON AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE M. FAITH ANGELL ON 7/30/2012; 7/31/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(tomg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS
LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. IV)
_________________________________________
MIKE THURMON, et al.
v.
A.W. CHESTERTON, INC., et al.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Consolidated Under
MDL DOCKET NO. 875
E.D. PA Civil Action No.
11-cv-63953
Transferor Court:
GA-N 11-01407

ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2012, after hearing oral argument on pending
discovery motions, and for the reasons stated in the attached memorandum, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
(1) Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation’s Motion for Protective Order
[Docket #204] is no longer active and should be marked “terminated”
on the docket.
(2) Defendant Eaton Corporation, as Successor-in-Interest to Cutler-Hammer,
Inc.’s Motion to Quash Plaintiffs’ Notice to Take Rule 30(b)(6) Video
Deposition and Notice to Produce to Defendant Eaton Corporation, or in the
Alternative, Motion for Protective Order [Docket #152] is no longer active and
should be marked “terminated” on the docket;
(3) Plaintiffs’ Motion to Extend Discovery [Docket #142] is DENIED.
(4) Plaintiffs’ Motion and Brief to Compel Discovery Previously Propounded on
Defendant Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. [Docket #96] is DENIED.
(5) Warren Pumps, LLC.’s Motion to Quash Plaintiffs’ Notice to Take Rule
30(b)(6) Video Deposition and Notice to Produce, Motion for Protective Order
and Response and Objection to Plaintiffs’ Notice to Take 30(b)(6) Video
Deposition to Notice to Produce [Docket #155] is GRANTED.
(6) Defendant Scapa Waycross, Inc.’s Motion to Quash Plaintiffs’ Notice to Take
Rule 30(b)(6) Video Deposition and Notice to Produce to Defendant Scapa
Waycross, Inc., or in the Alternative, Motion for Protective Order [Docket #153
is GRANTED.

Page 1 of 8

(7) Defendant Honeywell International Inc.’s Motion to Quash Plaintiffs’ Notice to
Take Rule 30(b)(6) Video Deposition and Notice to Produce to Honeywell
International Inc. and/or Motion for Protective Order [Docket #158] is
GRANTED; and
(8) Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions by Defendant Scapa Waycross, Inc. [Docket
#220] will be held under advisement pending ruling on Scapa Waycross’
motion for summary judgment.

BY THE COURT:
_S/M. FAITH ANGELL
___________
M. FAITH ANGELL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
By E-mail to: the Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno
Robert C. Buck, Esq.
Christian H. Hartley, Esq.
Travis D. Hilka, Esq.
Lee Ann Anand, Esq.
Erin E. Shofner, Esq.
Peter R. York, Esq.
Stephen C. Collier, Esq.
Ollie M. Harton, Esq.
David C. Marshall, Esq.
Frank C. Bedinger, III, Esq.
David L. Boohaker, Esq.
Frances L. Spinelli, Esq.
Ivan A. Gustafson, Esq.
Michael J. Zukowski, Esq.
Barbara J. Buba, Esq.
Jason W. Rubin, Esq.
Debra K. Haan, Esq.
Michael J. Rust, Esq.
Elizabeth R. Johnson, Esq.
James L. Hollis, Esq.
Malissa Kaufold-Wiggins, Esq.
Jeffrey A. Peters, Esq.
Sharon L. Neal, Esq.
W. Matthew Reber, Esq.
Lawrie E. Demorest, Esq.
William C. Massey, Esq.
Jody M. Rhodes, Esq.
Jennifer M. Studebaker, Esq.
William F. Mueller, Esq.
F. Saunders Aldridge, III, Esq.
Robert B. Lovett, Esq.
Page 2 of 8

[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]