UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATTON et al

Filing 6

ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S NOVEMBER 14, 2011 VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 1) IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; THE PLAINTIFF'S DECEMBER 1, 2011 MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DOCKET NO. 2) IS DENIED AS MOOT AND PLAINTIFF&# 039;S DECEMBER 12, 2011 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 3) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CLOSED FOR ALL PUPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 5/21/12. 5/22/12 ENTERED AND COPY MAILED.(rab, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
JOSEPH E. NAGY,
Plaintiff,

MISC. ACTION
No. 11-267

v.
LISLE PATTON, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of May, 2012, for the reasons stated in the
accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
(1)

the plaintiff’s November 14, 2011, Verified Criminal Complaint (Docket
No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice;

(2)

the plaintiff’s December 1, 2011, motion for a temporary restraining order
(Docket No. 2) is DENIED as moot; and,

(3)

the plaintiff’s December 12, 2011, motion for leave to amend the Verified
Criminal Complaint (Docket No. 3) is DENIED as moot.

BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
Gene E.K. Pratter
United States District Judge