BOYD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 055871.), filed by MACARTHUR LANE, MARK COOPER, BRAD JACKSON, ROBERT BELL, CHARLES ANTHONY, CLIFF HARRIS, MARVIN WOODSON, PAUL KRAUSE, NOEL JENKE, CHARLES MYRTLE, CEDRICK HARDMAN, BRUCE LAIRD, JOE DELAMIELLEURE, DON HORN, DENNIS HARRAH, JAMES WILLIAMS, MARK KONAR, TOMMY NOBIS, JAMES JONES, CALVIN JACKSON, TROY JOHNSON, MICHAEL MORTON, PETER LAZETICH, CALEB MILLER, JOSEPH KAPP, MICHAEL WEDDINGTON, HARVEY ARMSTRONG, DERLAND MOORE, MICHAEL MERRIWEATHER, JAMES HARRELL, AARON JONES, II, KENNETH EASLEY, JR, ESTATE OF GREGORY LENS, RICK SANFORD, WILLIAM "BILLY&quo SHIELDS, GARY PADJEN, CHARLES KRUEGER, PHIL VILLAPIANO, KEN FANTETTI, DONNIE GREEN, LEON "RAY" JARVIS, EDWARD WHITE, JOE FERGUSON, JR, LARRY WOODS, DONALD MACEK, JEFF BARNES, CHARLIE SMITH, LEE FOLKINS, DERRICK GAFFNEY, AUGUST "GUS" OTTO, PHILLIP FREEMAN, III, OLRICK JOHNSON, JR, WILLIE GREEN, JAMES HOUGH, CHARLEY HARRAWAY, THOMAS BEER, JAMES GARCIA, FRED FORSBERG, TERRANCE "TERRY&quo METCALF, BOBBY HARDEN, JR, DENNIS MCKNIGHT, ALFRED GROSS, GENE LANG, LEMUEL BARNEY, BRENT BOYD, DELLES HOWELL, JERRY ROBINSON, WILLIAM "BILL" CODY, VICTOR HICKS, ARTHUR STILL, REGINALD CLARK, CRAIG CURRY, DONALD MANOUKIAN, MARK NICHOLS, JEFF MCINTYRE, DAVID RECHER, LEONARD "BUBBA&quo MCDOWELL, JR, MIKE WOOD, TERRY OWENS, CLARENCE VERDIN, BRYAN STOLENBERG, ROD MARTIN, ROBERT KROLL, KEITH NORD, MICHAEL "TONY" DAVIS, CONRAD DOBLER, MELVIN CARVER, MIKE AUGUSTYNIAK, TRUMAINE JOHNSON, FRED SMERLAS, RANDY RAGON, MARGENE ADKINS, NEAL CRAIG, WILLIAM "BILLY&quo TRUAX, KORY MINOR, J. BRUCE JARVIS, LIONEL ANTOINE, STEVE JONES, PETER CRONAN, IRA MATTHEWS, III, MARK COTNEY, JEFFREY WALKER, MERVIN KRAKAU, JON MELANDER, LARRY WEBSTER, FRED ANDERSON. (Attachments: # 1 complaint, # 2 complaint, # 3 complaint, # 4 complaint, # 5 complaint, # 6 complaint, # 7 complaint, # 8 complaint, # 9 complaint, # 10 complaint, # 11 complaint, # 12 complaint, # 13 complaint, # 14 complaint, # 15 complaint, # 16 complaint, # 17 complaint, # 18 complaint, # 19 Civil Cover Sheet)(mima, )

Download PDF
(a) Failure to use reasonable care in the research ofthe concussions issue; (b) Failure to use reasonable care in responding to independent scientific studies on the risk of concussions and brain disease in sport, and in football in particular; (c) Failure to use reasonable care in denying the scientific evidence connecting NFL play to the risk of an occurence of brain disease; (d) Failure to use reasonable care in appointing competent and independent doctors and scientists to the MTBI Committee; and (e) Failure to use reasonable care in protecting Plaintiffs from the risk of brain disease and the sequelae of the concussions experienced by Plaintifß. 223. Plaintifß relied on the Defendants' misrepresentations (including affrrmative misrepresentation and omissions) detailed herein to their detriment. 224. The NFL breached its assumed duty to protect the health and safety of its players by subjecting NFL players to an increased risk of concussive brain injury. 225. and directions to The NFL failed to provide complete, current, and competent information NFL athletic trainers, physicians, and coaches regarding concussive brain injuries and its prevention, symptoms, and treatment. 226. If the NFL would have taken the necessary steps to oversee and protect the NFL players, including Plaintiffs, by developing and implementing necessary guidelines, policies, and procedures; providing reasonably safe helmets; and educating and training all persons involved with the NFL clubs in the recognition, prevention, and treatment of concussive brain injuries, the NFL players, such as Plaintiffs, would not have suffered from the subject condition or the effects of that condition, would have recovered more rapidly, or would not have 91 suffered long-term brain damage, including CTE, MCI, Alzheimer's disease or similar cognitive- impairing condition. 227. Under all of the above circumstances, it was foreseeable that the NFL's violations of its duties would cause or substantially contribute to personal injuries suffered by the Plaintiffs. 228. The NFL committed acts of omission and commission, which collectively and severally, constituted negligence. The League's negligence was a proximate and producing cause of injuries suffered by Plaintiffs. 229. In addition to the injuries suffered by Plaintiffs described herein, defendants' negligent conduct caused or contributed to the personal injuries ofthe individual named plaintiffs including neurodegenerative disorders and diseases including but not limited to CTE, MCI, Alzheimer's disease or similar cognitive-impairing conditions, past and future medical expenses, past and future loss of eamings, past and future emotional distress, and punitive damages. 230. As a result of the injuries of Plaintiffs, they are entitled to damages, as alleged herein or allowed by law. COUNT III Action For Fraud 231. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege each of the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs. 232. Until June of 2010, the NFL, through its MTBI Committee, the statements and actions of its Commissioner and its other agents and employees, made material misrepresentations (and omissions) to its players, former players, the Congress and the public at 92 large that there was no link between concussions and brain injury, including CTE, MCI, Alzheimer' s disease or similar cognitive-impairing conditions. 233. The persons who made the misrepresentations as agents of the NFL and the NFL knew the statements were false. 234. The persons who made the misrepresentations as agents of the NFL and the NFL intended to defraud the Plaintiffs. 235. The Plaintiffs justifiably relied on these misrepresentations to their detriment in getting care for their injuries. 236. The Plaintiffs were damaged by these misrepresentations. 237. In addition to the injuries suffered by Plaintiffs described herein, defendants' fraudulent conduct caused or contributed to the personal injuries ofthe individual named plaintiffs including neurodegenerative disorders and diseases including by not limited to CTE, MCI, Alzheimer's disease or similar cognitive-impairing conditions, past and future medical expenses, past and future loss of eamings, past and future emotional distress, and punitive damages. 238. As a result of the injuries of Plaintiffs, they are entitled to the damages, alleged herein or allowed by law. COUNT IV Fraudulent Concealment 239. Plaintiffs repeat and allege each of the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs. 240. Defendants and their MTBI Committee concealed and misrepresented information to the Plaintiffs and the public regarding the brain disease risks of repeated head impacts and concussions in NFL play, over the time period relevant to this Complaint. 93 as 241. At no time prior to June 2010 did Defendants correct their misrepresentations. Even after June 2010, Defendants have failed to adequately advise Plaintiffs and the public of these risks. 242. Defendants knew their statements in regard to concussions and medical risks were false, and they knew the Plaintiffs would specifically rely on these statements. 243. In addition to the injuries suffered by Plaintiffs described herein, Defendants' negligent conduct caused or contributed to the personal injuries of the Plaintiffs including neurodegenerative disorders and diseases including but not limited to CTE, MCI, Alzheimer's disease or similar cognitive-impairing conditions, past and future medical expenses, past and future loss of earnings, past and future emotional distress, and punitive damages 244. As a result of the injuries of Plaintiffs, they are entitled to the damages, as alleged herein or allowed by law. COUNT V Action for Loss of Consortium 245. Plaintifß repeat and reallege each of the allegations contained in the foregoing paragraphs. 246. Spouses of Plaintiffs have suffered damages in the past and will suffer damages in the future as a direct result of the injuries described above. 247. Spouses of Plaintiffs seek to recover for past and future loss of consortium and other harm to their relationship and marriage. 248. As a result of the injuries of Plaintiffs, spouses of Plaintifß are entitled to the damages, as alleged herein or allowed by law. 94 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WFIEREI'ORFI, Plaintitß pray fbr judgment with respcct to their Cornplaint as tbllows: I ro 28 U.S.C. { . With respect to Count I, granting the declaratory relief requested pursuant 2201; 2. With respect to Counts II through V, granting compensatory and punirive damages rvhere applicablc; 3. With respect to all counts. arvarding Plaintiflb their costs ancl disbursements in this action, including reasonablc attomeys' t'ees, to the extent permitted by law; 4. With respect to all counts, granting Plaintifß such other and lurther relicf as ¡nay be appropriate. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintifï's demand a trial hy jury on all matters so triable. Dated: January ? ,rln Respectlìrlly itted, St¡b¡rr Brent W. Landau (PA # 2021E9) Jeannine Kenney (PA # 307635) ¡.IAUSFELD LLP 1604 l.ocust Strcct Second Irloor Philadelphia, PA 19103 Telephone: (21 5) 985-1270 l;acsirnile: (2 I 5) 985-327 I b I n ncla u(àha u S f'c ld I I p. conr jlsrtnsJ@-l¡auii&ldllp.çç-lr Michael D. Flausfeld Richard Lewis Janles Pizzirr¡sso TTAUSFELD LLP 1700 K Street Nrrl/, Su¡rc 650 Washington, DC ?0006 Telephone: (202) 540-7200 Facsimi le: (202\ 5 40-7?0 I 95 mhausfe ld@hausfeldllp.com rlewi s@hausfeldllp.com pizzirusso@hausfeldllp.com j Michael P. Lehmann Jon T. King ArthurN. Bailey, Jr. HAUSFELD LLP 44 Montgomery Street suite 3400 San Francisco, CA 94rc4 Telephone: (415) 633-1908 Facsimile: (41 5) 358-4980 mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com king@hausfeldllp.com abailey@hausfeldllp.com j Thomas V. Girardi GIRARDI KEESE I 126 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 977 -021 I Facsimile: Q13) 481-1554 tgirardi@ girardikeese.com Martin H. Weisfuse WEISFUSE & WEISFUSE, LLP 420Lexing[on Avenue Room 2328 New Yorþ NY 10170 mhw@weisfuse.com Attorneysfor Plaintffi 96

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?