LAWRENCE v. MENTAL - HEALTH DOCTOR et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS', MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO.8) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO THE JUDICIAL DEFENDANTS; DEFENDANT, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S, MOTION TO DI SMISS (DOC. NO.9) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF;S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO THE DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; DEFENDANT, DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO.10) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DIS MISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO THE DEFENDANT DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA; AND PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH RESPECT TO THE REMAINING PARTIES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/27/2013. 3/28/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED. (kk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LIONEL S. LAWRENCE, SR.,
Plaintiff,

vs.
MENTAL – HEALTH DOCTOR,
ET AL.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-CV-642

ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2013, upon consideration of Defendants’
Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 8, 9, & 10) and Plaintiff’s Response thereto (Doc. No.
11), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

Defendant, Court Of Common Pleas’, Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) is

GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as to the Judicial
Defendants;
2.

Defendant, City of Philadelphia’s, Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 9) is

GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice as to the Defendant
City of Philadelphia;
3.

Defendant, Defender Association of Philadelphia, Motion to Dismiss (Doc.

No. 10) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice as to the
Defendant Defender Association of Philadelphia;1 and

1

With respect to any claims made under § 1983, Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

4.

Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice with respect to the

remaining parties.2
BY THE COURT:

/s/LAWRENCE F. STENGEL
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

2

Plaintiff failed to comply with my June 25, 2012 Order (Doc. No. 5) by serving the remaining parties under Rule
4(m). Therefore, I will dismiss the Complaint without prejudice against the unserved Defendants.