PRIOVOLOS v. RICHWINE et al
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 27) IS GRANTED. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFT. CPL AARON M. RICHWINE AND WARWICK POLICE DEPT. AND/OR TOWNSHIP ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ANY OUTSTANDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/18/13. 4/19/13 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ERNEST PRIOVOLOS,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-761
v.
CPL. AARON M. RICHWINE and
WARWICK POLICE DEPT. AND/OR
TOWNSHIP,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of April 2013, upon consideration of Defendants Corporal
Aaron M. Richwine and Warwick Township’s Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.
27), Defendants’ Statement of Material Undisputed Fact, including all attached exhibits (Doc.
No. 28), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 31), and in accordance with the Opinion of
the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED.
2.
All claims against Defendant Cpl. Aaron M. Richwine and Warwick Police Dept.
and/or Township are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3.
Any outstanding motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
4.
The Clerk of Court shall close the above-captioned case.
BY THE COURT:
/ s/ J oel H. S l om sk y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?