BOONE v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al

Filing 25

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS, AND THE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE MOTIONS ARE GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 11/1/12. 11/2/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RICHARD FRANCIS BOONE

v.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-0904

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA/COUNTY OF BUTTE,
COUNTY OF DELAWARE/MEDIA, PA
and PATRICIA COLEMAN
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2012, upon consideration of the Defendant
Patricia Coleman's Motion to Dismiss for Failing to State a Claim, Lack of Service of
Process, Improper Venue and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Rule 12(b) (Document No.4), the
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant County of Delaware Pursuant to F.R.
C. P. 12(b) (Document No. 6), the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant
County of Butte Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (Document No. 12), and the plaintiff's
responses, it is ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction.