D'ANGELO et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE JUDGMENT OF THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA. DATED 1/4/12, AWARDING ATTORNEY'S FEES TO APPELLEE UNDER 28 USC SECTION 1447(C) IS AFFIRMED. APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (D OC.#3, FILED 3/2/12) IS DENIED. APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC.#4, FILED 3/2/12) IS DENIED. APPELLANTS' COUNTERMOTION FOR SANCTIONS TO APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPELLANTS' APPEAL (DOC.#12, FILED 3/27/12), IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THE CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 8/7/12. 8/7/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.[FDC]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
_______________________________________
IN THE MATTER OF:
James Albert D’Angelo, Sr., and
Carolyn Marie D’Angelo

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-910
:
: Bankruptcy No. 11-14926
: Adversary No. 11-00744

ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of Debtors’ Brief in
Support of Debtors’ Appeal of Bankruptcy Court Order Granting J.P. Morgan Fees Under 28
U.S.C. § 1447(c) (Document No. 9, filed March 13, 2012) and the related filings, Appellee’s
Motion to Dismiss Appeal (Document No. 3, filed March 2, 2012) and Appellants’ Response and
Countermotion for Sanctions to Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Appellants’ Appeal (Document
No. 12, filed March 27, 2012), and Appellee’s Motion for Sanctions (Document No. 4, filed
March 2, 2012) and Appellants’ Response and Countermotion to Appellees’ Motion for
Sanctions (Document No. 11, filed March 26, 2012), for the reasons set forth in the
Memorandum dated August 7, 2012, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. The judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania dated January 4, 2012, awarding attorney’s fees to appellee under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1447(c), is AFFIRMED.
2. Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal (Document No. 3, filed March 2, 2012) is
DENIED.
3. Appellee’s Motion for Sanctions (Document No. 4, filed March 2, 2012) is DENIED.
4. Appellants’ Countermotion for Sanctions to Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Appellants’

Appeal (Document No. 12, filed March 27, 2012), is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall MARK the case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

_____/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois______
JAN E. DUBOIS, J.

2