THOMPSON v. VARANO et al

Filing 21

ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 8/29/12. 8/29/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(jpd,)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MR. BRIAN K. THOMPSON
v.
MR. DAVID A. VARANO, et al

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-1479

ORDER
NOW, this 28th day of August, 2012, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents’ Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus (Document No. 5), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States
Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (Document No. 7) and the petitioner’s
objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 17) and petitioner’s
supplemental objections to the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 20), and after
a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:
1.

The petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED;

2.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore

Wells is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3.

The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

4.

There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

/s/Timothy J. Savage
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.