ALPHA PRO TECH, INC. v. VWR INTERNATIONAL LLC

Filing 203

ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOCKET NO. 195) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE COURT'S ORDERS APPROVING PRO HAC VICE (DOCKET NOS. 15 AND 16) ARE VACATED AND THE APPLICATIIONS FOR PRO HAC VICE FOR DAVID ANDERSON AND DEANNA WEIDNER (DOCKET NOS. 11 AND 12) ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 3/14/18. 4/6/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALPHA PRO TECH, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
VWR INTERNATIONAL, LLC,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-1615

ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2018, upon consideration of Plaintiff Alpha Pro
Tech’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 195), Defendant VWR’s Response in Opposition
(Doc. No. 197), the Reply in Support (Doc. No. 198), and oral argument held on the motion on
February 28, 2018, it is hereby ORDERED that Alpha Pro Tech’s Motion for Reconsideration
(Doc. No. 195) is DENIED as outlined in the accompanying memorandum opinion. 1
It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Court’s Orders Approving Pro Hac Vice (Doc.
Nos. 15 & 16) are VACATED and the Applications for Pro Hac Vice for David Anderson and
Deanna Weidner (Doc. Nos. 11 & 12) are DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

In correspondence to the Court, the parties disputed whether the attorney fees should be determined now, or after
the conclusion of the counterclaim litigation. The Court will delay the determination of the amount of attorney fees
until the counterclaims have been resolved.