RIDDLE v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION FILED BY THE BANK OF AMERICA DEFENDANTS (119) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT UNITED GUARANTY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (118) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT GENWORTH'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (117) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (125) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 11/18/13. 11/18/13 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS J. RIDDLE, individually and :
on behalf of all other similarly situated, :
BANK OF AMERICA
CORPORATION, et al.,
AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2013, upon consideration of the Motion for
Summary Judgment by Defendants Bank of America Corp., Bank of America, N.A., and Bank of
America Reinsurance Corporation (“Bank of America Defendants”), Defendant Genworth’s
Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant United Guaranty’s Motion for Summary Judgment,
and Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Response thereto, and for the reasons provided in this Court’s
Memorandum dated November 18, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED that:
The summary judgment motion filed by the Bank of America Defendants
(Document No. 119) is GRANTED.
Defendant United Guaranty’s motion for summary judgment (Document No. 118)
Defendant Genworth’s motion for summary judgment (Document No. 117) is
Defendants’ Joint Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum in Support of
Their Motions for Summary Judgment (Document No. 125) is DENIED as moot.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
BY THE COURT:
Berle M. Schiller, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?