WALDRON v. PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT

Filing 32

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 23) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ROBERT M. WALDRON. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE/STRIKE (DOC. NO. 25) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK'S OFFICE SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 3/13/2013. 3/13/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT M. WALDRON, Plaintiff, v. : : : : : : : : PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, d/b/a/ FINANCIAL RECOVERIES Defendant. Civ. No. 12-1863 ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of March, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23), Defendant’s Motion to Exclude/Strike (Doc. No. 25), and all related submissions (Doc. Nos. 24, 27, 29), for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Professional Medical Management and against Plaintiff Robert M. Waldron. 3. Defendant’s Motion to Exclude/Strike (Doc. No. 25) is DENIED as moot. 4. The Clerk’s Office shall close this case for statistical purposes. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Paul S. Diamond _________________________ Paul S. Diamond, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?