PHILLIPS et al v. ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER et al

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 9) IS GRANTED IN PART, AND COUNT II OF THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. BY 4/5/2013, PLAINTIFFS MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. THE REMAINDER OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING IN A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 3/19/2013. 3/19/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEPHANIE PHILLIPS, et al. v. ST. MARY MEDICAL CENTER, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 12-2363 ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2013, defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss” (doc. no. 9) is granted in part, and Count II of the complaint is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. By Friday, April 5, 2013, plaintiffs may file an amended complaint. The remainder of defendants’ motion is denied without prejudice to refiling in a motion for summary judgment. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edmund V. Ludwig Edmund V. Ludwig, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?