EVERLINA & LAURICE CO v. BRIZEL et al

Filing 91

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 83) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM (DOC. 87) WHICH THE COURT CONSTRUES AS A CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 11/25/13. 11/26/13 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
EVERLINA LAURICE HARP,
Plaintiff,
v.
LAURICE EL BAHDRY RAHME, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-02401

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2013, for the reasons
set for in the accompanying memorandum, the following is hereby
ORDERED:
(1)

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 83)
is GRANTED;

(2)

Plaintiff’s “Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim” (ECF No.
87), which the Court construes as a Cross-Motion for
Summary Judgment, is DENIED;

(3)

The Clerk shall mark the case CLOSED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.