SMITH v. DONAHOE

Filing 54

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN DEFENDANT'S FAVOR ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM THAT HE WAS DENIED A REASONABLE ACCOMODATION FOR HIS DISABILITY. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS DEFENDANT' ;S MOTION IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION CLAIM IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 9/30/2013. 10/2/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ESTES SMITH v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-2639 ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of September, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, the responses and replies, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED to the extent Judgment is entered in Defendant’s favor on Plaintiff’s claim that he was denied a reasonable accommodation for his disability. For the reasons explained in the accompanying memorandum, such a claim was not administratively exhausted. In all other respects Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the reasonable accommodation claim is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ELIZABETH T. HEY ____________________________________ ELIZABETH T. HEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?