CALVANESE v. PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; THERE IS NO BASIS UPON WHICH TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPELABILITY. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 9/23/13. 9/24/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Pa. State Attorney General, et al.,
AND NOW, this
day of September, 2013, upon careful and independent
consideration of the Revised Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2254 (Doc. 5), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Jacob P. Hart (Doc. 21), as well as all supporting documentation, and finding no
objections 1 thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
The Petition for a Writ for Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2254 is DENIED;
There is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, C.J.
The Court notes Petitioner Calvanese is well aware of the process for submitting objections to the report
and recommendation of a magistrate judge. Calvanese previously filed objections to the Report and
Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson, recommending transfer of his case, with the Middle
District of Pennsylvania .. (Doc. 1 at 1 j ~ ~ 3:12-cv-00435 (M.D. Pa.) at Doc. 10.) It is therefore noteworthy
that Petitioner filed no objections to Magistrate Judge Hart's Report and Recommendation to deny his Petition for a
Writ of Habeas Corpus in its entirety.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?