BARLEE et al v. FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION et al

Filing 83

ORDER THAT MOTION OF UNITED GUARANTY RESIDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED PUTATIVE CLASS-ACTION COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AS TO PLFF SAYDEI G. BARLEE & OTHERWISE DENIED. MOTION OF GENWORTH MORTGAGE INSURANCE CORP., REPUBLIC MORTGAGE INSU RANCE COMPANY, & RADIAN GUARANTY INC. TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED PUTATIVE CLASS-ACTION COMPLAINT IS GRANTED & MOTION OF FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORP., FIRST TENNESSEE BANK, N.A., FIRST HORIZON HOMELOAN CORP., & FT REINSURANCE (USA) INC. TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED PUTATIVE CLASS-ACTION COMPLAINT IS DENIED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 2/27/13. 2/27/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SAYDEI G. BARLEE, et al. v. FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION, et al. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3045 ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2013, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of United Guaranty Residential Insurance Company to dismiss the first amended putative classaction complaint under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. #65) is GRANTED as to plaintiff Saydei G. Barlee and otherwise DENIED; (2) the motion of Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation, Republic Mortgage Insurance Company, and Radian Guaranty Inc. to dismiss the first amended putative class-action complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. #66) is GRANTED; and (3) the motion of First Horizon National Corporation, First Tennessee Bank, N.A., First Horizon Home Loan Corporation, and FT Reinsurance (USA) Inc. to dismiss the first amended putative class-action complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. #67) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Harvey Bartle III J. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?