UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PATTERSON et al

Filing 47

ORDER THAT PLFF'S REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLFF CONSTRUCTION HARDWARE, INC. & AGAINST DEFTS AEROPLATE CORP. & RONALD PATTERSON IN THE AMOUNT OF $253,083.84, ETC. PLFF'S REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF FEES & COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FILING OF THE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 6/10/14. 6/11/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE OF CONSTRUCTION HARDWARE, INC. v. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-3285 RONALD D. PATTERSON, ET AL. : ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of June , 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 42), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s request for sanctions is GRANTED. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Construction Hardware, Inc. and against Defendants Aeroplate Corp. and Ronald Patterson in the amount of $253,083.84, plus interest of six percent per annum from February 1, 2012 to the date of this Order, which represents 41.60 per day, 1 plus per diem storage charges of $90.00 per day from February 2, 2012 to the date of this Order. 2 1 See Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 31) for an explanation of the calculation of interest. The six percent simple interest rate is used pursuant to Pennsylvania statute. See 41 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 202 (indicating that if a document does not include the interest rate, the applicable rate should be six per cent per annum). February 2, 2012 represents the day that Construction Hardware supplied materials to Defendants and requested payment. 2 See Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment for an explanation of the calculation of storage costs. 2. Plaintiff’s request for reimbursement of fees and costs associated with the filing of the Motion for Sanctions is DENIED without prejudice. Counsel may submit documentation that supports the time spent and costs incurred. After receipt of the proper documentation, the Court will consider Plaintiff’s request for fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: ______________________________ R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?