DALTON et al v. MCCOURT ELECTRIC LLC et al

Filing 126

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT INTERMATIC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 99 ), IS DENIED. DELTRAN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 100 ), IS DENIED. THYSSEN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS (DOC . NO. 105 ), IS DENIED. THYSSEN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DISMISS DELTRAN'S FOURTH-PARTY COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 102 ), IS DENIED. THYSSEN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FIFTH-PARTY COMPLAINT (DOC.NO. 102 ), IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 8/5/2015. 8/5/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DONALD DALTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
MCCOURT ELECTRIC LLC, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-3568

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2015, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
•

Intermatic’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 99) is
DENIED;

•

Deltran’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 100) is
DENIED;

•

Thyssen’s motion for summary judgment to dismiss
Plaintiff’s claims (ECF No. 105) is DENIED;

•

Thyssen’s motion for summary judgment to dismiss Deltran’s
fourth-party complaint (ECF No. 102) is DENIED; and

•

Thyssen’s motion for leave to file a fifth-party complaint
(ECF No. 102) is GRANTED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.