CLARK et al v. COLWYN BOROUGH et al

Filing 72

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NOS. 57 AND 60 ), ARE GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED FOR THE DEFENDANTS COLWYN BOROUGH, WENDELL REED, AND TONETTE PRAY AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF MAURICE CLARK, ETC. JUDGMENT I S ENTERED FOR THE DEFENDANTS COLWYN BOROUGH, WENDALL REED, AND TONETTE PRAY AGAINST PLAINTIFFS KEVIN BANKS, SR., CLINTON CRADDOCK, WESLEY SEITZ, AND BRYANT STERLING, ETC. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED FOR THE DEFENDANT TREVOR PARHAM AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF KEVIN BANKS, SR. AS TO HIS CLAIMS FOR UNLAWFUL RETALIATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 8/10/2015. 8/10/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MAURICE CLARK, et. al.
v.
COLWYN BOROUGH, et. al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 12-3668

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2015, upon
consideration of the defendants’ motions for summary judgment
(Docket Nos. 57 & 60) and the opposition thereto, and after oral
argument, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing
today’s date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants’ motions
are GRANTED.

Judgment is entered for the defendants Colwyn

Borough, Wendell Reed, and Tonette Pray and against the
plaintiff Maurice Clark as to his claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1983;
judgment is entered for the defendants Colwyn Borough, Wendell
Reed, and Tonette Pray against the plaintiffs Kevin Banks, Sr.,
Clinton Craddock, Wesley Seitz, and Bryant Sterling as to their
claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Pennsylvania Whistleblower
Law; and judgment is entered for the defendant Trevor Parham and
against the plaintiff Kevin Banks, Sr. as to his claims for
unlawful retaliation.

1

BY THE COURT:

_/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin_
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

2