CORINTHIAN MARBLE & GRANITE, INC. v. T.D. BANK, N.A.

Filing 16

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND IS GRANTED, AND THIS CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. BECAUSE THE CASE IS REMANDED, THE COURT DOES NOT RULE ON DEFENDANT TD BANK, N.A[.]'S MOTION TO DISMISS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 1/23/13. 1/24/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
_____________________________________
CORINTHIAN MARBLE & GRANITE,
INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
T.D. BANK, N.A.
Defendant.
_____________________________________

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 12-cv-3744

ORDER
AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand
(Document No. 8, filed August 2, 2012), Defendant TD Bank, N.A[.]’s Opposition to Corinthian Marble
& Granite, Inc.’s Motion to Remand (Document No. 12, filed August 17, 2012), Plaintiff’s Reply
Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Document No. 14, filed
August 24, 2012), and Defendant TD Bank, N.A[.]’s Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 6, filed July 7,
2012), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated January 23, 2013, IT IS ORDERED that
Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to the Court of Common
Pleas of Philadelphia County. Because the case is remanded, the Court does not rule on Defendant TD
Bank, N.A[.]’s Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall MARK this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
______________________
JAN E. DuBOIS, J.