WODARCZYK v. SOFT PRETZEL FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. et al

Filing 47

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 23 AND PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED RESPONSE TO THE MOTION 33 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 9/30/13. 9/30/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Peter Wodarczyk,
Plaintiff,
v.
Soft Pretzel Franchise Systems, Inc.,
d/b/a Philly Pretzel Factory; Ted Fine;
Ron Heil; Gary Nolan
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 2:12-cv-3874

ORDER RE DENIAL OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND NOW, this 30th day of September 2013, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment (ECF 23) and Plaintiff’s Amended Response to the Motion (ECF 33), it
is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
_______________________________
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.

O:\CIVIL 12\12-3874 wodarczyk v. soft pretzel\12cv3874Order Denying Ds SJ Mot - 9.30.13.docx