DIXON v. GLUNT et al

Filing 13

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; AND PETITIONER HAS NOT MET STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS TO HAVE HIS CASE HEARD AND NO REASONABLE JURIST COULD IFND THIS PROCEDURAL RULING DEBATABLE; THUS, A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 2/15/13. 2/15/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, ) Modified on 2/15/2013 (pr, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PAUL DIXON v. STEVEN GLUNT, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION 12-4000 ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2013, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Respondents’ Motion, inclusive of all exhibits thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and 3. Petitioner has not met statutory requirements to have his case heard and no reasonable jurist could find this procedural ruling debatable; thus, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?