BROWN v. ROGERS et al

Filing 10

ORDER THAT: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 5/22/13. 5/22/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)

Download PDF
- -------~--------------------L.------~ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT QF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION SHARIF BROWN, [Inmate #981715], Petitioner, v. NO. 12-4063 HON. JUDGE PETER RODGERS, et al., Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this 2 2."/ day of , 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the response, Petitioner's reply to the response, and available state court records, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPR<lVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DI~MISSED; 3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NO'J.t issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutiona~ jurist would debate the correctness of this ruling. right nor demonstrated that a reasonable See 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and 4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?