SHERMAN v. COMPOSITION SYSTEMS, INC.

Filing 29

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 8/13/13. 8/14/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES SHERMAN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. COMPOSITION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. NO. 12-4106 ORDER DENYING PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 13th day of August 2013, after review of Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF 21) and Defendant’s Response thereto (ECF 24), Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 22), Plaintiff’s Response thereto (ECF 25 & 27), and Defendant’s Reply (ECF 26), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF 21) is DENIED; and 2. Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF 22) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson _______________________________ MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\Matt12\12cv4106 - Sherman v. Composition Systems\12cv4106.Order re Mots. for Sum. J..docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?