SHERFEY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
MEMORANDUM AND/OR ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RANDOM ASSIGNMENT AND TO STRIKE THE DEFENDATS' DESIGNATION OF RELATED ACTIONS (DOC. NO.7) IS GRANTED. THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE ASSIGNMENT CLERK FOR RANDOM ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 40.1(c)(1). SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 8/17/2012. 8/17/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STACY SHERFEY, et al.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al.
AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2012, upon
consideration of the plaintiffs’ Motion for Random Assignment and
to Strike the Defendants’ Designation of Related Actions (Docket
No. 7), the defendants’ responses thereto, and for the reasons
stated in a memorandum of law bearing today’s date, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.
The above-captioned case is referred to the assignment
clerk for random assignment pursuant to Local Rule 40.1(c)(1).
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?