SHERFEY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al

Filing 53

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO.18) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS PETER B. LUTHER, ASHLEY A. MCEVOY, GARY BENEDICT, EDWIN K. KUFFNER, M.D., LORRAINE K. BAILER, WILLIAM C. WELDON, COLLEEN GOGGINS, AND ROSEMARY CRANE, ARE DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 1/29/2014. 1/29/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (kk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STACY SHERFEY, as an administrator of the estate of Tracen Sherfey, a minor, deceased, STACEY SHERFEY, and NEIL SHERFEY, Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 12-4162 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiffs, Stacy Sherfey, as the administrator of the Estate of Tracen Sherfey, a minor, deceased, Stacy Sherfey, and Neil Sherfey’s, (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 18), Defendants, Johnson & Johnson, McNeil-PPC, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Sales & Logistics Company, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Peter B. Luther, Ashley A. McEvoy, Gary Benedict, Edwin K. Kuffner, M.D., Lorraine K. Bailer, William C. Weldon, Colleen Goggins, Rosemary Crane, Inmar Inc., Carolina Supply Chain Services, LLC, and Carolina Logistics Services, LLC’s (collectively, “Defendants”), Responses, Plaintiffs’ Replies thereto, and after an oral argument held on December 6, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Defendants, Peter B. Luther, Ashley A. McEvoy, Gary Benedict, Edwin K. Kuffner, M.D., Lorraine K. Bailer, William C. Weldon, Colleen Goggins, and Rosemary Crane, are DISMISSED from this action. BY THE COURT: /s/ Robert F. Kelly ROBERT F. KELLY SENIOR JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?