SHERFEY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. NO.18) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS PETER B. LUTHER, ASHLEY A. MCEVOY, GARY BENEDICT, EDWIN K. KUFFNER, M.D., LORRAINE K. BAILER, WILLIAM C. WELDON, COLLEEN GOGGINS, AND ROSEMARY CRANE, ARE DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 1/29/2014. 1/29/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (kk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STACY SHERFEY, as an administrator
of the estate of Tracen Sherfey, a minor,
deceased,
STACEY SHERFEY, and
NEIL SHERFEY,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 12-4162
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2014, upon consideration of Plaintiffs,
Stacy Sherfey, as the administrator of the Estate of Tracen Sherfey, a minor, deceased, Stacy
Sherfey, and Neil Sherfey’s, (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 18),
Defendants, Johnson & Johnson, McNeil-PPC, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Sales & Logistics
Company, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Peter B. Luther, Ashley A. McEvoy, Gary Benedict,
Edwin K. Kuffner, M.D., Lorraine K. Bailer, William C. Weldon, Colleen Goggins, Rosemary
Crane, Inmar Inc., Carolina Supply Chain Services, LLC, and Carolina Logistics Services, LLC’s
(collectively, “Defendants”), Responses, Plaintiffs’ Replies thereto, and after an oral argument
held on December 6, 2013, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that Defendants, Peter B. Luther, Ashley A. McEvoy, Gary
Benedict, Edwin K. Kuffner, M.D., Lorraine K. Bailer, William C. Weldon, Colleen Goggins,
and Rosemary Crane, are DISMISSED from this action.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
SENIOR JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?