WASHINGTON-POPE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Filing
23
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT BAILEY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 16) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (SECTION C) (DOCKET NO. 17) IS DENIED. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT CITY OF PHILAD ELPHIA SHALL APPEAR IN CHAMBERS (ROOM 10613) 601 MARKET STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19106, AT 4:30 P.M ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2013 FORE A STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/22/13. 10/22/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
YOLAINA WASHINGTON-POPE,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 12-4300
ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2013, upon consideration of Mr. Bailey’s second
Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 16), Section C 1 of the City of Philadelphia’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 17), Ms. Washington-Pope’s responses thereto (Docket Nos.
18 & 19), oral argument held on October 15, 2013, and the City of Philadelphia’s Supplemental
Memorandum (Docket No. 21), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
Mr. Bailey’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 16) is GRANTED;
2.
the City of Philadelphia’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Section C) (Docket No.
17) is DENIED; and
3.
Counsel for Ms. Washington-Pope and the City of Philadelphia shall appear in
Chambers (Room 10613, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106) at
4:30 PM on Monday, November 18, 2013, for a status and scheduling conference.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge
1
In a letter to the Court and as confirmed at oral argument, the City of Philadelphia withdrew
all but Section C of its Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice to raising its other
arguments later in this litigation.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?