FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CRAVEN et al
Filing
28
ORDER THAT COUNT X IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE MOTIONS ARE DENIED S TO COUNTS I-III AND IX. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 7/17/13. 7/19/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, in its
individual capacity and as subrogee of
JP MORGAN BANK, N.A., successor to
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A.,
Plaintiff,
v.
VINCENT E. CRAVEN, Jr., et. al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-4306
ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of July, 2013, upon consideration of (1) Defendants Vincent E.
Craven, Jr., Aimee F. Craven, Valerie A. Craven, and Monument Mortgage’s (“the Cravens”) Motion
to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Docket No. 22), Plaintiff Fidelity National Title Insurance
Company’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 24), and the Cravens’ Reply Brief (Docket No. 26);
and (2) Defendant Tammi M. Torbik’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Docket No. 21),
Fidelity’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 23), and Tammi Torbik’s Reply Brief (Docket No. 25),
it is hereby ORDERED that both Motions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as
follows:
1.
Count X is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2.
The Motions are DENIED as to Counts I–III and IX.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?