WILSON v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
Filing
16
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXPAND IS DENIED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE AND THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 4/15/13. 4/15/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER ANDE-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HENRY WILSON,
Petitioner,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION
AND PAROLE, et al.,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-4489
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2013, for the reasons set
forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
(1) The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) is APPROVED
and ADOPTED;
(2) Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 14) are OVERRULED;
(3) The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is
DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
(4) Petitioner’s Motion to Expand the Record (ECF No. 12)
is DENIED;
(4) A certificate of appealability shall not issue; and
(5) The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?