CRADDOCK v. DARBY BOROUGH et al

Filing 36

ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED FOR THE DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF AS OUTLINED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING CLAIMS FOR ASSAULT AND BATTERY AGAINST THE DEFENDANT ROBERT SMTHE AND BRYAN BAKER ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 4/22/2015. 4/23/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CLINTON CRADDOCK
v.
DARBY BOROUGH, et. al.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 12-4519

ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of April, 2015, upon
consideration of the defendants’ partial motion for summary
judgment (Docket No. 29) and the opposition and reply thereto,
for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today’s
date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants’ motion is
GRANTED.

Judgment is entered for the defendants and against the

plaintiff as to the plaintiff’s claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1983,
28 U.S.C. § 1985, Pennsylvania civil conspiracy law, and the
Pennsylvania Human Relations Act.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff’s remaining claims
for assault and battery against the defendants Robert Smythe and
Bryan Baker are DISMISSED without prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

_/s/ Mary A. Mclaughlin__
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.