BYRD et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER, ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 17) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS IN LIMINE (DOCKET NOS. 29-33) ARE DEEMED MOOT. THE CASE IS DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES, INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 11/6/14. 11/6/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DOROTHY BYRD et al.
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 12-4520
ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of November, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 17), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition (Docket No. 19),
and Defendants’ Reply Brief (Docket No. 21), for the reasons set forth in the Court’s
Memorandum Opinion of even date, the Court hereby ORDERS AND DECREES that:
1.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 17) is GRANTED;
2.
Defendants’ Motions in Limine (Docket Nos. 29-33) are DEEMED MOOT;
3.
The captioned case is DISMISSED; and
4.
The Clerk of Court shall MARK THIS CASE CLOSED for all purposes,
including statistics.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?