SARGENT v. ASTRUE

Filing 16

ORDER THAT JUDGE HART'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARE HEREBY APPROVED AND ADOPTED. SARGENT'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THIS CASE IS HEREBY REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U SC 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH JUDGE HART'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 2/15/2013. 2/15/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT SARGENT, JR. v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-4564 ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of plaintiff Robert Sargent, Jr.’s brief and statement of issues in support of request for review (docket entry # 10), defendant Michael J. Astrue's response thereto (docket entry # 11), and the Honorable Jacob P. Hart’s thorough and well-reasoned report and recommendation (docket entry # 15), to which neither party has filed an objection within the period specified by Loc. R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV (b), and the Court agreeing with Judge Hart that remand is necessary so that the Administrative Law Judge may consider (a) Sargent’s cervical spine disorder as a severe impairment; (b) the correct lumbar spinal x-ray, rather than the misidentified x-ray later determined not to depict Sargent’s spine, on which the ALJ relied; and (c) evidence of Sargent’s persistent bilateral wheezing, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Judge Hart’s report and recommendation (docket entry # 15) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Sargent’s request for review (docket entry # 10) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 3. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with Judge Hart’s report and recommendation (docket entry # 15); and 4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case statistically. BY THE COURT: /s/ Stewart Dalzell, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?